Copper $ 3.07 +0.00 +0% Volume: April 17, 2014
Silver $ 19.64 -0.03 -0.15% Volume: April 18, 2014
Gold $ 1,295.10 -7.55 -0.58% Volume: April 17, 2014
TSX: MUX $ 2.49 -0.03 -1.19% Volume: 131,810 April 17, 2014
NYSE: MUX $ 2.26 -0.02 -0.88% Volume: 1,825,877 April 17, 2014
1,295.10 -7.55 -0.58% Volume: Pricing delayed 20 minutes April 17, 2014 6:55 PM
Operations
Operations

Gold Bar – Nevada (Development)

Gold Bar project is a proposed mine development project consisting of a conventional open pit mine with an oxide gold heap leach recovery circuit. The project is located within the Battle Mountain-Eureka-Cortez gold trend in Eureka County, Central Nevada. The property was previously mined from 1990 to 1994 by Atlas Precious Metals Inc. The nearest operating mines are Barrick Gold's Ruby Hill, which produced 91,000 ounces of gold in 2013 with an all-in-sustaining cost of $877 per ounce and is located approximately 25 miles to the Southeast; and Barrick Gold’s Cortez mine, which produced 1.34 million ounces of gold in 2013 with an all-in-sustaining cost of $433 per ounce and is located approximately 35 miles to the Northwest.

The Gold Bar project is currently in the permitting phase with permits expected to be received in 2015. A pre-feasibility study was completed by SRK Consulting and published in November 2011.

McEwen Mining continues to advance the Gold Bar permitting process for construction and production. Gold Bar is forecasted to produce 50,000 ounces gold per year for 8 years at a cash cost of $700 per ounce and an all-in sustaining cost of $850 per ounce. The project is located primarily on public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The BLM and theNevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) are the primary government agencies responsible for approving the permits that would allow the Company to begin construction. In Q4 2013, the Company submitted its Plan of Operations (PoO) for Gold Bar to the BLM. The BLM has provided the Company with its comments and the Company's responses were resubmitted at the end of February. Once accepted as complete, the PoO will serve as the basis for the National Environmental Policy Act analysis. McEwen Mining is targeting final approval by the end of Q2, 2015 in order to begin construction.

Gold Bar technical information on this page was derived from: (1) the technical report titled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on Resources and Reserves Gold Bar Project, Eureka County, Nevada” dated February 24, 2012 with an effective date of November 28, 2011, prepared by J. Pennington, C.P.G., MSc., Frank Daviess, MAusIMM, Registered SME, Eric Olin,, MBA, RM-SME, MSc, Herb Osborn, P.E, Joanna Poeck, MMSA, B. Eng., Kent Hartley P.E. Mining, SME, BSc, Mike Levy, P.E, P.G, MSc., Evan Nikirk, P. E., Mark Allan Willow, M.Sc, C.E.M. and Neal Rigby, CEng, MIMMM, PhD, all of whom are qualified persons and all of whom are independent of McEwen Mining, each asdefined by NI 43-101. To access the report click here. And, (2) a news release titled “McEwen Mining Financial & Operating Results" released on March 10, 2014 by McEwen Mining Inc. To access the news release click here.

Cautionary Notes
McEwen Mining reports its resource estimates in accordance with standards of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum referred to in Canadian National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101"). These standards are different from the standards generally permitted in reports filed with the SEC. Under NI 43-101, McEwen Mining reports measured, indicated and inferred resources, measurements which are generally not permitted in filings made with the SEC. According to Canadian NI 43-101 criteria, the estimation of measured resources and indicated resources involve greater uncertainty as to their economic feasibility than the estimation of proven and probable reserves. Under SEC Industry Guide 7 criteria, measured, indicated and inferred resources are considered Mineralized Material. The SEC considers that in addition to greater uncertainty as to the economic feasibility of Mineralized Material compared to proven and probable reserves, there is also greater uncertainty as to the existence of Mineralized Material. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that measured or indicated resources will be converted into economically mineable reserves. The estimation of inferred resources involves far greater uncertainty as to their existence and economic viability than  the estimation of other categories of resources. 

Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

This website contains certain forward-looking statements and information and investors are encouraged to review our "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statement". 

 


Subscribe to Our Mailing List

Email Address *

 
Enter the code shown above.